Linked Life Data

10513783

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10513783

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
7
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-10-21
pubmed:abstractText
Although the anteroposterior dimension of the left atrium is universally used in clinical practice and research, we hypothesized that it may be an inaccurate surrogate for volume because its use is based on the unlikely assumption that there is a constant relation among atrial dimensions. The following measurements of the left atrium were made at end ventricular systole: (1) M-mode-derived anteroposterior linear dimension from the parasternal long-axis view; (2) digitized planimetry of the left atrial (LA) cavity from the apical 4-chamber view; and (3) digitized planimetry of the LA cavity from the apical 2-chamber view. The following volume calculations were obtained from these digital measurements: (1) volume derived from the M-mode dimension assuming a spherical shape; (2) volume derived from the single plane area-length of apical 4-chamber view, which assumes that LA geometry can be generalized from a single 2-dimensional plane; and (3) volume derived from the biplane method of discs. The correlation coefficient between the M-mode and biplane methods of determining LA volume was r = 0.76. The mean difference (+/-2 SDs) between these methods is -25 +/- 33 ml. The correlation coefficient between the single plane apical 4-chamber and biplane methods of determining LA volume is r = 0.97. The mean difference (+/-2 SDs) between these methods was -5.0 +/- 12 ml, indicating good agreement. The M-mode measure of the left atrium is an inaccurate representation of its size. Two-dimensional-derived LA volumes provide a more accurate measure of the true size of the left atrium and are more sensitive to changes in LA size. When an echocardiographic measure of LA size is made either in an individual patient or as a variable in a research study, the M-mode measure should be avoided.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
0002-9149
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
1
pubmed:volume
84
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
829-32
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1999
pubmed:articleTitle
Best method in clinical practice and in research studies to determine left atrial size.
pubmed:affiliation
University of California, San Francisco, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article