Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10495081rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0262306lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10495081lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0038636lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10495081lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0221198lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10495081lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0001721lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10495081lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0012632lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10495081lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10495081lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0442805lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10495081lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1979874lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10495081lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009830lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:dateCreated1999-11-22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:abstractTextPedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg) lesions block place preferences to drugs or food only when animals are nondeprived. PPTg lesions also disrupt operant responding, but lesioned rats cannot discriminate active from inactive levers. It is not clear, therefore, whether PPTg lesions block reward or disrupt the ability to differentiate changes in reward magnitude. These hypotheses were tested by measuring sucrose consumption, choice, and contrast effects after PPTg lesions. Both sham and lesioned rats consumed greater amounts of a sucrose solution as the concentration and level of deprivation were increased. Given a choice between 2 solutions, all rats consumed more of the higher concentration. Both groups exhibited contrast effects when the concentration was shifted from 32% to 4% within a session. Somewhat surprisingly, lesions increased sucrose intake when rats were food-restricted. These results suggest that PPTg lesions do not disrupt primary motivation or the ability to evaluate and respond to changes in reward strength.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:monthAuglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:issn0735-7044lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RobbinsT WTWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EverittB JBJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OlmsteadM CMClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ClarkeE JEJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:authorpubmed-author:InglisW LWLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BordeauxC PCPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WallumN PNPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:volume113lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:pagination732-43lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:dateRevised2009-9-29lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10495081...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10495081...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10495081...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10495081...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10495081...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10495081...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10495081...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10495081...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10495081...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10495081...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10495081...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10495081...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10495081...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:year1999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:articleTitleLesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus increase sucrose consumption but do not affect discrimination or contrast effects.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, England. olmstead@pavlov.psyc.queensu.calld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10495081pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed