Linked Life Data

10402777

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10402777

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
7
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-10-5
pubmed:abstractText
The median sternotomy has been accepted as the most common approach to the heart, because this approach is easily opened and closed, and easy access to the entire heart is possible. Following the pioneering work by Cosgrove and colleagues of using a parasternal incision for aortic and mitral valve operations, several reports suggested that modified minimal access procedures are likely to be associated with reduced postoperative discomfort and faster recovery. Since July 1997, we have used an upper partial sternotomy and a limited skin incision for isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) at our hospital. To demonstrate the benefits of this approach, we compared 14 AVR operations using our minimal access incision (group M) with 19 patients undergoing isolated AVR using a conventional sternotomy (group F). In the minimal access group of patients, a small skin incision was made from the second intercostal space to the fourth rib. The pectralis major and intercostal muscle was freed from the sternum, and then a transverse half sternotomy was made in the fourth intercostal space using a striker without injury to the right internal mammary artery. A median partial sternotomy from the supersternal notch to the level of the fourth intercostal space. Cardiopulmonary bypass was connected through the same access site to avoid cannulation of both groins. Conversion to median sternotomy was not necessary in any patient including reexploration for postoperative bleeding. There was no operative mortality, stroke, aortic dissection and perivalvular leaks due to technical factors. In group F, wound infection occurred in 1 patient. One patient in group M required reoperation to control postoperative bleeding. Although mean duration of operation, cardiopulmonary bypass, and cross clamp time in group M was not prolonged, the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic crossclamp was delayed by difficulties of cannulations. The distance between the transverse sternotomy (lower edge of divided sternum) and the midpoint of aortic valve annulus was correlated with mean duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and cross clamp time. Our experience demonstrates that isolated AVR through an upper partial sternotomy allows the same quality operations as the full sternotomy, although more clinical experience is required to clarify the benefits of this approach. Excellent exposure of the aortic valve through a partial sternotomy may be attained, if an adequate approach can be selected by the position of aortic valve.
pubmed:language
jpn
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jul
pubmed:issn
0021-5252
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
52
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
519-24; discussion 525-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1999
pubmed:articleTitle
[Aortic valve operations through an upper partial sternotomy].
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Koshigaya Hospital, Dokkyo University School of Medicine, Saitama, Japan.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract