Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
850
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-4-27
pubmed:abstractText
This investigation was undertaken to quantify accuracy errors and identify possible linearity errors in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of bone, based on studies of commercially available bone densitometers for planar densitometry. The following was found in a combination of in vitro phantom studies and in vivo investigations of human volunteers: (1) Pronounced differences between the instruments when measuring vertebral size and contours of the projected bone regions. (2) Falsely low bone mineral content (BMC in terms of g) in cases of low nominal bone mass, due to the fact that edge regions were omitted by the calculation software of some devices. (3) An increase in the projected bone area secondary to an increase in nominal bone mass with some instruments. (4) Clinically and statistically significant errors of accuracy of BMC and to a lesser extent bone mineral density (BMD). (5) Substantial linearity errors with some osteodensitometers for BMC, a phenomenon that reduces the usefulness of this parameter. It is concluded that DXA devices are affected by a combination of accuracy errors and linearity errors, some more than others, and that linearity errors influence their ability to monitor change in BMC and to a lesser extent in BMD, making system intercomparison difficult.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
0007-1285
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
71
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1062-8
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1998
pubmed:articleTitle
Linearity and accuracy errors in bone densitometry.
pubmed:affiliation
Hillerød Hospital, Department of Clinical Physiology, Denmark.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study