Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10155675
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1996-1-24
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and economic effects of 2 clinical strategies for treating severe (grade II and above) erosive oesophagitis or poorly responsive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. A single-blind, randomised controlled trial of up to 8 weeks' duration was undertaken comparing omeprazole with ranitidine plus metoclopramide in patients with severe and symptomatic erosive oesophagitis (endoscopic grade II and above). Two cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated: cost per healed patient and cost per symptom-free day. The study perspective was that of the payer or insurer of medical care. Healing rates were significantly higher among omeprazole-treated patients than among those who received ranitidine/metoclopramide at 4 weeks (68.5% vs 30.4%; p < 0.01) and overall (81.5% vs 45.7%; p < 0.01). Overall, mean gastrointestinal-related direct medical costs per healed patient were lower for the omeprazole group ($US189.60) than for the ranitidine/metoclopramide group ($US319.28). The incremental cost of an additional cure with omeprazole compared with ranitidine/metoclopramide was $US24.05. The overall average cost per symptom-free day was lower in the omeprazole group ($US7.88) than in the ranitidine/metoclopramide group ($US10.81). The incremental cost to obtain an additional symptom-free day with omeprazole, compared with ranitidine/metoclopramide, was $US1.41. In conclusion, superior efficacy at comparable cost is achieved by omeprazole compared with ranitidine/metoclopramide in the treatment of patients with severe erosive oesophagitis.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
T
|
pubmed:chemical |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Anti-Ulcer Agents,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Antiemetics,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Drug Combinations,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Metoclopramide,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Omeprazole,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Ranitidine
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Oct
|
pubmed:issn |
1170-7690
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
8
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
343-9
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:10155675-Anti-Ulcer Agents,
pubmed-meshheading:10155675-Antiemetics,
pubmed-meshheading:10155675-Cost-Benefit Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:10155675-Double-Blind Method,
pubmed-meshheading:10155675-Drug Combinations,
pubmed-meshheading:10155675-Esophagitis,
pubmed-meshheading:10155675-Esophagoscopy,
pubmed-meshheading:10155675-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:10155675-Metoclopramide,
pubmed-meshheading:10155675-Omeprazole,
pubmed-meshheading:10155675-Prospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:10155675-Ranitidine
|
pubmed:year |
1995
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Omeprazole or ranitidine plus metoclopramide for patients with severe erosive oesophagitis. A cost-effectiveness analysis.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
University of Pennsylvania, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Comparative Study,
Randomized Controlled Trial,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't,
Multicenter Study
|