Linked Life Data

10137556

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10137556

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1994-12-15
pubmed:abstractText
Aims to assess the level of agreement between priorities of service provision in 20 discrete clinical areas, as laid out in a district health authority (DHA) purchasing plan, and the views of GPs in the catchment area of that authority and to test for a statistically significant difference between the views of fundholding and non-fundholding GPs. A 74 per cent response rate was achieved, and analysis suggested that local GPs' views were broadly in line with their DHA strategy, and that a significant difference existed between the views of fundholders and non-fundholders in only one treatment area, namely that of lithotripsy. Concludes that the postal questionnaire is a cheap and easy method of assessing the views of GPs on prioritizing issues. As yet there is little difference between fundholding and non-fundholding GPs in this area of decision making.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
H
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0268-9235
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
8
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
56-63
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1994
pubmed:articleTitle
Prioritizing services: GPs' views, fundholders versus non-fundholders.
pubmed:affiliation
Wakefield Healthcare, UK.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study