Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-3-29
pubmed:abstractText
Surgery is considered the standard treatment for operable esophageal carcinoma, although there is no compelling evidence that surgery can achieve better results than radiotherapy. There has previously been no direct randomized comparison of these two modalities with survival or disease specific outcome end points.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0008-543X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
15
pubmed:volume
85
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
763-8
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1999
pubmed:articleTitle
The quality of swallowing for patients with operable esophageal carcinoma: a randomized trial comparing surgery with radiotherapy.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Randomized Controlled Trial