Linked Life Data

9987187

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/9987187

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-4-15
pubmed:abstractText
Our experience from attempts to identify bacteria isolated from boar bite/gore wounds is the background for a discussion of identification problems. Some organisms, although not very common or well-known, can be identified when using commercial kits or conventional methods, provided they are sufficiently characterized, as exemplified by Pasteurella aerogenes isolated from cases 1 and 2. Some organisms may be wrongly identified, or not identified, by both commercial kits and conventional methods, unless seen by experienced microbiologists with knowledge of the original literature. This is exemplified by case 3, in which the final identification result was Bisgaard's taxon 15. Sometimes isolates cannot be identified even in reference laboratories and by using available identification tables and databases. In such cases, the organism involved may turn out to belong to a previously undescribed taxon. This is illustrated by the strains isolated from cases 4 and 5.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
0934-8840
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
288
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
491-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1998
pubmed:articleTitle
Problems of identification in clinical microbiology exemplified by pig bite wound infections.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Viborg Hospital, Denmark.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Case Reports