Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-2-23
pubmed:abstractText
In 42 endotracheally intubated patients, we examined the utility of a miniaturized monoplane probe for transnasal transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Transnasal TEE was prospectively evaluated in 26 deeply and 16 mildly sedated patients receiving topical anesthesia with lidocaine jelly 2%. The patients with deep sedation were additionally examined with transoral monoplane and multiplane TEE. Transnasal esophageal insertion of the TEE probe was successfully performed in 90% of patients. Endotracheal malpositioning was corrected in two patients. Nasal bleeding required treatment in another patient. Topical anesthesia was adequate in 82% of mildly sedated patients. Left ventricular short- and four-chamber long-axis views of good quality were obtained with transnasal (transoral) monoplane TEE in 76% (81%) and 92% (96%) of patients (differences not significant). Compared with conventional multiplane TEE, transnasal monoplane TEE missed diagnoses in 19% of patients. The relative error (mean +/- SEM) of quantification with transnasal TEE was <9% +/- 2% for ventricular diameters and <7% +/- 2% for cross-sectional area measurements, with a bias of 0.5 +/- 3.8 cm2 and 0.1 +/- 2.4 cm2 (mean +/- 2 SD) for left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic short-axis areas. The relative error in measuring intracardiac flow velocities was >40%, but systolic to diastolic peak velocity ratios at the valvular site were determined with an error <4% +/- 3%. Transnasal monoplane TEE can be performed even in mildly sedated patients with an endotracheal tube without further need for analgesia or sedation. The technique is as useful as conventional transoral TEE to image standard tomographic planes for quantification, but it is less suited for comprehensive echocardiographic diagnosing. Implications: Transnasal insertion of a miniaturized monoplane transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probe was studied in endotracheally intubated patients. Nasal passage was well tolerated even by patients with only mild sedation. Imaging quality was similar to conventional transoral monoplane TEE with larger transducers, but technical restraints cause a deficit in complete cardiac diagnosing obtained with multiplane TEE.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0003-2999
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
88
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
306-11
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Anatomy, Cross-Sectional, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Anesthesia, Intravenous, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Anesthesia, Local, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Anesthetics, Local, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Bias (Epidemiology), pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Blood Flow Velocity, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Cardiac Output, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Echocardiography, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Echocardiography, Transesophageal, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Epistaxis, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Equipment Design, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Female, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Heart Valves, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Hypnotics and Sedatives, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Intubation, Intratracheal, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Lidocaine, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Male, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Miniaturization, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Nose, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Prospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Respiration, Artificial, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Sensitivity and Specificity, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Transducers, pubmed-meshheading:9972746-Ventricular Function, Left
pubmed:year
1999
pubmed:articleTitle
Transnasal transesophageal echocardiography: a modified application mode for cardiac examination in ventilated patients.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Anesthesiology, Julius-Maximilians-Universität, Würzburg, Germany. cgreim@anaesthesie.uni-wuerzburg.de
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study