Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1998-11-24
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Managed care guidelines such as those by Milliman & Robertson (M&R) are being implemented with increasing frequency. Many fellows of the American College of Surgeons have raised concerns that the targets set by the M&R guidelines are too aggressive. Uninformed attempts to reach these targets may harm patients. The primary hypothesis of this study was that many of the M&R guidelines are at wide variance from the actual length of stay of patients treated for these diseases.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Oct
|
pubmed:issn |
0003-4932
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
228
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
579-87
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2008-11-20
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:9790347-Consensus Development Conferences as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:9790347-Data Collection,
pubmed-meshheading:9790347-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:9790347-Length of Stay,
pubmed-meshheading:9790347-Practice Guidelines as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:9790347-Surgical Procedures, Operative
|
pubmed:year |
1998
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
An analysis of 25 Milliman & Robertson guidelines for surgery: data-driven versus consensus-derived clinical practice guidelines.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|