pubmed-article:9709282 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0043210 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:9709282 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0001792 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:9709282 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0920317 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:9709282 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0203028 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:9709282 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0814225 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:9709282 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0282440 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:issue | 22 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1998-9-17 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:abstractText | Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of screening mammography have been conducted involving women aged 40-49 at entry. Current data are now available from these trials at 10.5 to 18 years of follow-up (average follow-up time: 12.7 years). Meta-analysis has been performed using a Mantel-Haenszel estimator method to combine current follow-up data from the eight RCTs of mammography that included women aged 40-49 at entry, including new follow-up data presented at the NIH Consensus Development Conference held January 21-23, 1997. Combining the most recent follow-up data on women aged 40-49 at entry into all eight RCTs yields a statistically significant 18% mortality reduction among women invited to screening mammography (relative risk: 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.71-0.95). Combining all current follow-up data on women aged 40-49 at entry into the five Swedish RCTs yields a statistically significantly 29% mortality reduction among women invited to screening (relative risk: 0.71; 95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.89). Meta-analysis including the most recent follow-up data from all eight RCTs involving women aged 40-49 at entry demonstrates for the first time a statistically significant mortality reduction due to regular screening mammography in women of this age group. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:issn | 1052-6773 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SmithR ARA | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SmartC RCR | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:HendrickR ERE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:RutledgeJ... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:pagination | 87-92 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2007-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9709282-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9709282-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9709282-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9709282-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9709282-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9709282-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9709282-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9709282-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9709282-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9709282-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9709282-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:year | 1997 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:articleTitle | Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262, USA. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:9709282 | pubmed:publicationType | Meta-Analysis | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:9709282 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:9709282 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:9709282 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:9709282 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:9709282 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:9709282 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:9709282 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:9709282 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:9709282 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:9709282 | lld:pubmed |