Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9
pubmed:dateCreated
1998-9-16
pubmed:abstractText
We evaluated a cytomegalovirus (CMV) 24-hour shell vial assay (SVA), the Murex Hybrid Capture CMV DNA assay (HCA), and a CMV plasma PCR for the detection of CMV viremia in renal and bone marrow transplant recipients and human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. CMV viremia was detected by at least one method in 125 of 317 evaluable samples (39.4%) from 78 patients and was detected in 19.8% of samples by SVA, 26.8% by HCA, and 32.2% by plasma PCR. There was moderate to substantial agreement between the results of the different tests (kappa coefficient = 0.415 to 0.631). However, HCA and plasma PCR were significantly more sensitive than SVA (P = 0.001 and P < 0.0001, respectively; McNemar's test), and plasma PCR was more sensitive than HCA (P = 0.031; McNemar's test). HCA and plasma PCR were more consistently positive than SVA during viremic episodes (P = 0.0002 and P < 0.0001, respectively; McNemar's test). The use of HCA or plasma PCR may therefore improve the diagnosis and management of CMV disease in susceptible patient groups.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-1321171, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-1333479, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-1666311, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-2546301, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-6088574, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-7615738, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-7699056, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-7798658, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-7813501, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-7844553, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-8077384, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-8212208, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-8395098, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-8727896, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-8748266, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-8789039, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-8940430, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-8940454, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-9203650, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-9316939, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9705391-9574700
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0095-1137
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
36
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
2554-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1998
pubmed:articleTitle
Evaluation of the murex hybrid capture cytomegalovirus DNA assay versus plasma PCR and shell vial assay for diagnosis of human cytomegalovirus viremia in immunocompromised patients.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Clinical Virology, Royal Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom. W.Y.Barrett-Muir@mds.qmw.ac.uk
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study