Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
1
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1998-9-10
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Because there is no universally accepted grading system for ovarian epithelial carcinoma, we attempted to compare the prognostic utility of the individual components used in some systems--both architectural and cytologic features, as well as mitotic activity and histologic tumor type--to determine which of these components fit best with survival.
|
| pubmed:commentsCorrections | |
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Jul
|
| pubmed:issn |
0090-8258
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
70
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
2-12
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1998
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Toward the development of a universal grading system for ovarian epithelial carcinoma. I. Prognostic significance of histopathologic features--problems involved in the architectural grading system.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|