Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
7
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1998-11-19
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The aim of the study was to verify the validity and the accuracy of the 5-min running field test (5RFT) relatively to the classical treadmill test. Two groups of subjects were tested, the first one being made of sub-elite runners (G1, n = 18) and the second one of athletes of other individual or collective disciplines (G2, n = 23). To check the field technique, maximal aerobic velocity (vamax) and an approached VO2max calculated from vamax during the 5RFT were compared with the corresponding values directly determined during a treadmill test. vamax obtained on treadmill (vamax(t)) or during a 5RFT (vamax(5)) were significantly higher in G1 than in G2 (+3.7 km.h-1 and +3.6 km.h-1 among the test). In each group, the difference between vamax(t) and vamax(5) was not significant (19.4 +/- 1.0 vs 19.5 +/- 0.9 km.h-1 in G1; 15.7 +/- 2.2 vs 15.9 +/- 1.2 km.h-1 in G2). A significant correlation was found between vamax(t) and vamax(5) (slope = 0.92; r = 0.86 in G1; slope = 0.71; r = 0.84 in G2). In each group, the approached VO2max(5) was significantly higher than VO2max(t) (respectively 67.8 +/- 2.9 vs 63.7 +/- 3.5 in G1; 54.8 +/- 3.9 vs 52.0 +/- 3.2 ml.min-1.kg-1 in G2. Weak but significant correlations were found between VO2(t) and vamax(5) (r = 0.69 and r = 0.56 respectively in G1 and G2). In conclusion, the 5RFT allows to measure vamax accurately whatever the physical fitness of the subjects but more closely in runners than in non-runners. The low correlation between VO2max(t) and vamax(5) for both groups indicates that a vamax running field test is specific and cannot evaluate VO2max with reasonable accuracy whatever the group, runners or non-runners.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Dec
|
pubmed:issn |
1381-3455
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
105
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
633-9
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:9693709-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:9693709-Energy Metabolism,
pubmed-meshheading:9693709-Exercise Test,
pubmed-meshheading:9693709-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:9693709-Lactic Acid,
pubmed-meshheading:9693709-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:9693709-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:9693709-Oxygen Consumption,
pubmed-meshheading:9693709-Physical Fitness,
pubmed-meshheading:9693709-Running,
pubmed-meshheading:9693709-Sports,
pubmed-meshheading:9693709-Time Factors
|
pubmed:year |
1997
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Maximal aerobic velocity measured by the 5-min running field test on two different fitness level groups.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Laboratoire Performance Motrice, Université Blaise Pascal, Aubière, France.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|