Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
7
pubmed:dateCreated
1998-8-6
pubmed:abstractText
The aim of this study was to evaluate test-retest reliability of a dynamometer in measuring lifting strength or force parameters under several combinations of ergonomic factors. Thirteen healthy participants were tested on peak force (PF), related variables and isometric strength (IS) twice, at intervals of 3 months. Correlation coefficients for all parameters in the sagittal plane were 0.60-0.85. Coefficients of variations (CVs) of methodology error for PF in the sagittal plane were 6.2-6.9%. Correlation coefficients and CVs for IS at 90 degrees to the lateral plane were 0.51-0.54 and 16.6-17.9%, respectively. In paired t-tests of the parameters under all conditions, there was a significant difference between test and retest. In the test and retest, ratings of perceived exertions for the low back and the right arm in isometric lifting were significantly higher than those in dynamic lifting. It was concluded that the test-retest reliability of dynamic forces in the dynamometer was high. The peak force in the sagittal plane was considered reliable. In isometric lifting, isometric strength in the sagittal plane seemed reliable, while that at right angles to the lateral plane was considered to be less reliable.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jul
pubmed:issn
0014-0139
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
41
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1050-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1998
pubmed:articleTitle
Test-retest reliability of isometric and isoinertial testing in symmetric and asymmetric lifting.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Physical Education, Daido Institute of Technology, Nagoya, Japan.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Randomized Controlled Trial