Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1998-10-7
pubmed:abstractText
One of the more difficult issues in the development of each edition of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) has been a possible sex bias in the personality disorder diagnoses. A substantial amount of discussion and research on this issue has occurred since the 1980 publication of the third edition of the DSM. It is now apparent that there are a number of different ways in which the differential sex prevalence rates for the DSM-IV personality disorders could reflect a sex bias, including biased diagnostic constructs, biased thresholds for diagnosis, biased population sampling, biased application of diagnostic criteria, biased instruments of assessment, and biased diagnostic criteria. It is important to understand these different forms of sex bias, as each can occur independently of, be confused with, and interact with one another. The purpose of this paper is to differentiate among, and to describe the support for, each of these different forms of sex bias, with the hope of contributing to their recognition and ultimate resolution.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0885-579X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
12
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
95-118
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-1-28
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1998
pubmed:articleTitle
Invited essay: sex biases in the diagnosis of personality disorders.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article