Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6 Pt 1
pubmed:dateCreated
1998-6-16
pubmed:abstractText
LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration is currently determined in most clinical laboratories by the Friedewald calculation. This approach has several limitations and may not meet the current total error requirement in LDL-C measurement of < or = 12%. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of the direct N-geneous LDL-C assay (Equal Diagnostics). The N-geneous method correlated highly with the modified beta-quantification assay (r = 0.95; y = 0.91x + 70.6 mg/L; n = 199), showed no significant effect of increased triglyceride or other common interferants, and performed adequately in serum samples from nonfasting individuals. This assay demonstrated a mean total error of 6.75% over a wide range of LDL-C concentrations. In addition, at the medical decision cutoff points, this LDL-C assay showed positive predictive values of 78-95% and negative predictive values of 84-99%. We conclude that the N-geneous LDL-C meets the currently established analytical performance goals and appears to have a role in the diagnosis and management of hypercholesterolemic patients.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0009-9147
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
44
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1242-50
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1998
pubmed:articleTitle
Analytical and clinical performance of a homogeneous enzymatic LDL-cholesterol assay compared with the ultracentrifugation-dextran sulfate-Mg2+ method.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA. rifai@a1.tch.harvard.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't