Linked Life Data

9620406

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/9620406

Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:9620406rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2700615lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9620406lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0425358lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9620406lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0006309lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9620406lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1265549lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9620406lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0003241lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9620406lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011900lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9620406lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0039593lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9620406lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1511790lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9620406lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220825lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:dateCreated1998-7-28lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:abstractTextThe sensitivities and specificities of 17 antibody detection tests for brucellosis in goats were estimated. Tests evaluated included the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) card test with 8% cell concentration (8%Card), USDA rapid automated presumptive test (RAP), Mexican rose bengal plate tests with 8 and 3% cell concentrations (8%RB and 3%RB), French rose bengal plate test with 4.5% cell concentration (4.5%RB), USDA standard plate test (SPT), USDA buffered acidified plate agglutination test (BAPA), USDA and Mexican rivanol tests (URIV and MRIV), USDA standard tube tests with Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis antigens (SATA and SATM), serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), USDA cold-fixation complement fixation tests with B. abortus and B. melitensis antigens (CFA and CFM), USDA and Mexican milk ring tests (UBRT and MBRT), and a milk ELISA. Test sensitivity was evaluated by using two groups of 10 goats experimentally infected with B. melitensis or B. abortus and monitored for 24 weeks. Specificity was evaluated by using 200 brucellosis-free nonvaccinated goats from 10 California herds. The 3%RB was considered a good screening test because of high sensitivity at week 24 postinfection (90%), ease of performance, and low cost. The cold-fixation CFA and CFM had 100% specificity in the field study and were considered appropriate confirmatory tests. The milk ELISA was significantly more sensitive (P < 0.05) than the UBRT and significantly more specific (P < 0.05) than the MBRT. The milk ELISA also had the advantage of objectivity and ease of interpretation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:issn0095-1137lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HennagerS GSGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GardnerI AIAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HietalaS KSKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EdmondsonA...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MikolonA BABlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Hernandez...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Chamizo...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:volume36lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:pagination1716-22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:year1998lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:articleTitleEvaluation of North American antibody detection tests for diagnosis of brucellosis in goats.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9620406pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:9620406lld:pubmed