Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1998-8-4
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Recent evaluations of ACT programs have produced equivocal findings, often leading to the invocation of methodological problems as responsible for the lack of positive results. This paper discusses issues of theory and methodology as they pertain to improving research of ACT, with particular attention paid to issues of sampling, process evaluation, measurement, and data analysis.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Apr
|
pubmed:issn |
0002-9432
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
68
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
246-60
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2005-11-16
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:9589762-Bias (Epidemiology),
pubmed-meshheading:9589762-Community Mental Health Services,
pubmed-meshheading:9589762-Data Interpretation, Statistical,
pubmed-meshheading:9589762-Deinstitutionalization,
pubmed-meshheading:9589762-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:9589762-Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care),
pubmed-meshheading:9589762-Psychotic Disorders,
pubmed-meshheading:9589762-Research
|
pubmed:year |
1998
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Methodological issues in assertive community treatment studies.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH, USA. Gregory.McHugo@Dartmouth.edu
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review
|