Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1998-6-30
pubmed:abstractText
The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of two resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements to etched and unetched enamel and to dentin. Thirty-six noncarious human premolar teeth were used. Flat buccal and lingual surfaces were prepared. Dyract and Compoglass were used. The teeth were distributed at random into six groups of six teeth each. The materials were handled according to manufacturers' instructions. In groups 1 and 3 the enamel was etched with 37 percent phosphoric acid. All samples were sheared with an Autograph AG5 machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Two way ANOVA and comparison with the Tukey test were used to evaluate the results. These showed that on etched enamel Dyract had a significantly higher bond strength (p = 0.02); on unetched enamel Compoglass had a statistically higher bond strength (p = 0.003), and on dentin the materials provided the same bond strength. Overall, disregarding surfaces, there was no difference between the two materials.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
D
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1945-1954
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
65
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
29-31
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-11
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
A comparison of the bond strength to enamel and dentin of two compomers: an in vitro study.
pubmed:affiliation
Dental School, University of Murcia, Spain.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial