Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
4
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1998-5-21
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Twenty-six laboratories used X and Y chromosome probes and the same procedures to process and examine 15,600 metaphases and 49,400 interphases from Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated lymphocytes. In Part I, each laboratory scored 50 metaphases and 200 interphases from a normal male and a normal female from its own practice. In Part II, each laboratory scored 50 metaphases and 200 interphases on slides prepared by a central laboratory from a normal male and a normal female and three mixtures of cells from the male and female. In Part III, each laboratory scored 50 metaphases (in samples of 5, 10, 15, and 20) and 100 interphases (in samples of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 50) on new, coded slides of the same specimens used in Part II. Metaphases from male specimens were scored as 98-99% XY with no XX cells, and 97-98% of interphases were scored as XY with 0.04% XX cells. Metaphases from female specimens were scored as 96-97% XX with 0.03% XY cells, and 94-96% of interphases were scored as XX with 0.05% XY cells. Considering the data as a model for any probe used with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), a statistical approach assessing the impact of analytical sensitivity on the numbers of observations required to assay for potential mosaicisms and chimerisms is discussed. The workload associated with processing slides and scoring 50 metaphases and 200 interphases using FISH averaged 27.1 and 28.6 minutes, respectively. This study indicates that multiple laboratories can test/develop guidelines for the rapid, efficacious, and cost-effective integration of FISH into clinical service.
|
| pubmed:grant | |
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:chemical | |
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Apr
|
| pubmed:issn |
0148-7299
|
| pubmed:author |
pubmed-author:Al SaadiAA,
pubmed-author:ArnoldSS,
pubmed-author:BaderP IPI,
pubmed-author:BloughRR,
pubmed-author:DewaldGG,
pubmed-author:ElejaldeB RBR,
pubmed-author:ErdödiFF,
pubmed-author:FORTD JDJ,
pubmed-author:HarrisC JCJ,
pubmed-author:HigginsR RRR,
pubmed-author:HoeltgeG AGA,
pubmed-author:HsuW TWT,
pubmed-author:KubicVV,
pubmed-author:McCorquodaleD JDJ,
pubmed-author:MicaleM AMA,
pubmed-author:MooreJ WJW,
pubmed-author:PhillipsR MRM,
pubmed-author:Scheib-WixtedSS,
pubmed-author:SchwartzSS,
pubmed-author:SiembiedaSS,
pubmed-author:StallardRR,
pubmed-author:StroleKK,
pubmed-author:VanceG HGH,
pubmed-author:WiktorAA,
pubmed-author:ZinsmeisterAA
|
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:day |
1
|
| pubmed:volume |
76
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
N
|
| pubmed:pagination |
318-26
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-14
|
| pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:9545096-Cytogenetics,
pubmed-meshheading:9545096-DNA Probes,
pubmed-meshheading:9545096-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:9545096-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:9545096-In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence,
pubmed-meshheading:9545096-Interphase,
pubmed-meshheading:9545096-Laboratories,
pubmed-meshheading:9545096-Lymphocyte Activation,
pubmed-meshheading:9545096-Lymphocytes,
pubmed-meshheading:9545096-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:9545096-Metaphase,
pubmed-meshheading:9545096-Phytohemagglutinins,
pubmed-meshheading:9545096-Quality Control,
pubmed-meshheading:9545096-Reproducibility of Results,
pubmed-meshheading:9545096-Sensitivity and Specificity,
pubmed-meshheading:9545096-Workload,
pubmed-meshheading:9545096-X Chromosome,
pubmed-meshheading:9545096-Y Chromosome
|
| pubmed:year |
1998
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
A multicenter investigation with interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization using X- and Y-chromosome probes.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.,
Multicenter Study
|