Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1998-8-20
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The aim of this study was to compare the shaping ability of two stainless steel files using simulated canals. A total of 80 simulated canals of various angles and positions of curvature were prepared by hand using either Mani K-Files or Micro Mega K-Files. Following orifice enlargement each file type was used to prepare 40 canals employing a linear filing motion and an anticurvature stepback technique. Pre- and post-operative longitudinal images of the canals were taken with a video camera and stored and manipulated in a computer with image analysis software. The presence of canal aberrations and the amount of material removed as a result of preparation were determined from composite images of superimposed pre- and post-operative views. Overall, canal preparation with Mani K-Files was significantly quicker (P < 0.005) and was associated with fewer instrument failures. Zips and elbows were observed in 70% of specimens with significantly more (P < 0.05) occurring following preparation with Micro Mega K-Files. Mani K-Files created significantly more (P < 0.01) danger zones. Micro Mega K-Files created significantly wider (P < 0.001) zips with significantly more (P < 0.01) resin removed from the outer aspect of the curves and, thus, significantly more (P < 0.01) transportation. Canal shape had a significant influence on preparation time (P < 0.001), the incidence of zips (P < 0.05) and danger zones (P < 0.005), the width of zips (P < 0.001) and transportation at the zips (P < 0.001). Under the conditions of this study, Mani K-Files were more effective than Micro Mega K-Files and produced canals with better shapes. Original canal shape had a substantial influence on the outcome of shaping procedures.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
D
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jan
|
pubmed:issn |
0143-2885
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
30
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
35-45
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2008-8-7
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:9477792-Analysis of Variance,
pubmed-meshheading:9477792-Dental Alloys,
pubmed-meshheading:9477792-Dental Pulp Cavity,
pubmed-meshheading:9477792-Epoxy Resins,
pubmed-meshheading:9477792-Equipment Design,
pubmed-meshheading:9477792-Equipment Failure,
pubmed-meshheading:9477792-Evaluation Studies as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:9477792-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:9477792-Image Processing, Computer-Assisted,
pubmed-meshheading:9477792-Models, Structural,
pubmed-meshheading:9477792-Root Canal Preparation,
pubmed-meshheading:9477792-Stainless Steel,
pubmed-meshheading:9477792-Time Factors
|
pubmed:year |
1997
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparison of two stainless steel files to shape simulated root canals.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
In Vitro
|