Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
10
pubmed:dateCreated
1998-1-27
pubmed:abstractText
We assessed the interindividual diagnostic variance of 39 experienced arthroscopists by the Kappa Cohen interobserver variation analysis using videotapes of eight different patients with different diagnoses. Arthroscopically normal findings showed a relatively acceptable interobserver correlation. Pathological changes, in contrast, often showed very little correlation, especially in the synovial membrane of the suprapatellar recess, in the cartilage of the femoropatellar groove and the posterior cruciate ligament. In patellar alignment there was also great interobserver variation. Clinical relevance: When comparing arthroscopic findings with other imaging techniques the above results should be taken into account. Furthermore, these results will affect the significance of medical expertise based only on pictures. In addition, medical cost billing, which is based on arthroscopic findings, has to take into account that a wrong diagnosis is possible and therefore charges will be wrong.
pubmed:language
ger
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
0177-5537
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
100
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
782-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1997
pubmed:articleTitle
[Interobserver variation in diagnostic arthroscopy of the knee joint. "How really objective are arthroscopic findings?"].
pubmed:affiliation
Klinik und Poliklinik für allgemeine Orthopädie, St. Radboud Universitätsklinik Nimwegen, Niederlande.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, English Abstract