Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
5-6
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1998-1-13
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The relative conspicuities of six test garments (fluorescent orange, green/red, high-contrast, fluorescent lime-yellow, white, black) were assessed to guide the selection process of a standard upper body safety garment to be used within the New Zealand logging industry. Six male and four female participants, aged between 18 and 26 years, volunteered to perform 10 trials each on a demanding, central (tracking) task, while peripherally searching colour slides for test garments displayed on each of eight positions, against a pine forest background typically found in the New Zealand forestry. During each trial, transparency luminance was first gradually increased from darkness to daylight and then decreased to darkness again within 180 s. A head mounted ASL eye tracking system (4000SU) recorded the eye line of gaze for each participant, enabling a rank order of detection to be obtained for the tested garments in each trial. The fluorescent lime-yellow, fluorescent orange and white test garments were detected earlier than any other test garments across all trials, and the fluorescent lime-yellow test garment was detected first with a higher frequency than the white test garment. It was concluded that while white may be the most visible colour in near darkness conditions, as it provides highest contrast, fluorescent lime-yellow stands out better in twilight and daylight conditions against the pine forest background. The results of this study led to the promotion of fluorescent lime-yellow as the standard safety colour used in upper body garments within the New Zealand forest industry.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0003-6870
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
28
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
323-9
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:9414372-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:9414372-Attention,
pubmed-meshheading:9414372-Color Perception,
pubmed-meshheading:9414372-Contrast Sensitivity,
pubmed-meshheading:9414372-Eye Movements,
pubmed-meshheading:9414372-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:9414372-Forestry,
pubmed-meshheading:9414372-Human Engineering,
pubmed-meshheading:9414372-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:9414372-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:9414372-New Zealand,
pubmed-meshheading:9414372-Protective Clothing,
pubmed-meshheading:9414372-Reaction Time
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Testing the relative conspicuity of safety garments for New Zealand forestry workers.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Psychology Department, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Randomized Controlled Trial
|