Linked Life Data

9326125

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/9326125

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-10-16
pubmed:abstractText
A prospective controlled trial was carried out to compare two different fluid delivery systems used for shoulder arthroscopy. One an advanced pump system that controls both pressure and flow of fluid delivered, the other an air-driven diaphragm pump that only controls fluid pressure. Blood loss, presence of bleeding vessels and visual clarity were parameters used to assess the pump systems. There was no difference between the pumps in straightforward shoulder procedures. However, complicated and prolonged procedures benefited from the use of the advanced pump system.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0035-8843
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
79
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
341-4
pubmed:dateRevised
2010-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1997
pubmed:articleTitle
Aquaflo pump vs FMS 4 pump for shoulder arthroscopic surgery.
pubmed:affiliation
Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Controlled Clinical Trial