Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
4
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1997-10-22
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Recently, we have noted an increasing incidence of revisions being performed in patients implanted with the length and girth expanding AMS 700 Ultrex* inflatable penile prosthesis. This observation prompted us to compare the long-term mechanical reliability of the AMS Ultrex inflatable penile prosthesis versus the girth-expanding AMS 700 CX* or CXM* inflatable penile prosthesis in men with organic erectile dysfunction.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Oct
|
| pubmed:issn |
0022-5347
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
158
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
1400-2
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1997
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Long-term mechanical reliability of AMS 700 series inflatable penile prostheses: comparison of CX/CXM and Ultrex cylinders.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Urology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio, USA.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|