Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
7
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-10-29
pubmed:abstractText
Facilitated by an enhanced appreciation for pelvic anatomy and physiology along with a better understanding of patterns of rectal cancer spread, great advances have been made in our ability to perform restorative resections for an ever-increasing proportion of mid and distal rectal cancers. Whereas oncologic results following a low anterior resection were the principal concern 20 years ago, recent efforts have focused on improving functional results as well. Aspirations for improved function need to be tempered by the realization that improved sphincter-saving rates must follow improved oncologic results rather than jeopardize them. Some crucial questions are addressed in this paper: What are the variables involved in optimizing the oncologic and functional results of a low anterior resection and a coloanal reconstruction? What are the issues involved in selecting a particular coloanal reconstruction (straight versus pouch, stapled versus handsewn, with or without fecal diversion) for a particular patient? Who is not a good candidate for a coloanal reconstruction?
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0364-2313
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
21
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
721-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1997
pubmed:articleTitle
Ultra-low anterior resection and coloanal pouch reconstruction for carcinoma of the distal rectum.
pubmed:affiliation
Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review