Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-9-17
pubmed:abstractText
Data from a completed randomized trial in breast cancer are used to demonstrate and quantify the variation in estimated survival curves and log-rank statistics at different times throughout a trial. False 'plateaux' are common, as are wide fluctuations in chi2 values obtained from the log-rank test when there are few events. We show how analyses conducted at different times can demonstrate different effects. Long follow-up is often necessary to allow correct interpretation of results. We discuss the assumption of proportional hazards and the consequences of making that assumption inappropriately. We show how checking whether hazards are proportional can help in avoiding erroneous conclusions.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0007-0920
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
76
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
551-8
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1997
pubmed:articleTitle
Cautionary tales of survival analysis: conflicting analyses from a clinical trial in breast cancer.
pubmed:affiliation
ICRF Breast Unit, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article