Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-10-15
pubmed:abstractText
Comparison of the serological results from the NIAID-funded Multicenter Acellular Pertussis Trial (MAPT) and the efficacy trials are complicated by differences in assay methods, immunization schedules, vaccine lots and populations immunized. In spite of these differences, serological results closely approximating those obtained in the MAPT were found for most or all of the assayed antibodies in the Mainz and Erlangen studies. Serological results for some of the antigens included in the vaccines used in the Italian and Stockholm trials were similar to the MAPT results, while significant differences were noted with other antigens. Differences in immunization schedules and serological assay methods made comparisons between MAPT and the Gothenburg and Senegal trials more difficult. Our understanding of the efficacy trial results, and our ability to apply those results to the U.S. population, would be enhanced markedly by simultaneous re-analysis of stored sera from MAPT and selected efficacy trials. This goal should be given priority by the study organizers and sponsors.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0301-5149
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
89
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
265-73
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1997
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of serological results in the NIAID Multicenter Acellular Pertussis Trial with recent efficacy trials.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.