Linked Life Data

9224509

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/9224509

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-8-26
pubmed:abstractText
Severe acute liver failure is associated with high mortality. Improved respiratory and hemodynamic management together with intracranial pressure monitoring and aggressive treatment of cerebral edema have greatly improved patient care. However, many patients die despite optimal medical treatment, because of failure to arrest the progression of cerebral edema. This in turn result in brain stem herniation with rapid neurologic deterioration and death. Liver transplantation has emerged as the definitive treatment for patients with severe acute liver failure. Unfortunately approximately up to one half of the patients with this severe form of liver failure will die while awaiting liver transplantation. There is thus a clear need for a liver support system to provide a "bridge" to transplantation. Over the years, many "bridge" systems were introduced which promised effective support but had no wide clinical success. Because of our incomplete understanding of the pathophysiology of liver failure and development of cerebral edema, it was felt that use of isolated hepatocytes or ex vivo whole liver perfusion would provide both detoxifying and synthetic functions. Whole liver perfusion appears to be effective but cumbersome and costly because it would require each center, where patients are being treated, to maintain animal colonies for patient treatment. Therefore, cryopreserved isolated xenogeneic hepatocytes appear to be the best candidates for building a "bridge" system. In a preliminary clinical study, we have used a porcine hepatocyte-based liver support system (Bioartificial Liver: BAL) to treat patients with acute liver failure as well as patients with acute exacerbation of chronic liver disease. Patients in the first group, who were candidates for transplantation, were successfully bridged to a transplant with excellent survival. No obvious benefit from BAL treatments was seen in the second group. In this group patients where cerebral edema is not a major component of the clinical presentation, it is possible that long-term support will be needed with repeated treatments over several weeks to provide adequate synthetic and detoxifying liver function until the patients' livers recover. For such liver recovery to take place, these chronic patients will need to be treated earlier in the course of their disease when they still have some residual liver mass as well as regenerative capacity. Prospective controlled trials will be initiated as soon as the current phase I study is concluded in order to determine the efficacy of this system in both patient populations.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1060-913X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
13
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
331-48
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1995
pubmed:articleTitle
Artificial hepatic support systems.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, In Vitro, Historical Article