Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-9-18
pubmed:abstractText
With the recent rapid expansion in the use of the comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) technique, increased attention to quality control is essential. In the present study, we show that despite optimization and standardization of metaphase preparation techniques and the commercial availability of metaphase spreads, batch-to-batch variability of the preparations remains a significant problem. To facilitate reliable CGH analysis despite this variability, we have developed a rapid denaturation test to assess the quality of the preparations without hybridization and quantitative image analysis criteria for assuring the day-to-day quality of CGH experiments, including sensitivity, specificity, and dynamic range. Monitoring the dynamic range of the hybridizations was found to be particularly critical for achieving sensitive and reliable CGH results. This reliability can be achieved, for example, by hybridization of a green-labeled normal male DNA against red-labeled female DNA and monitoring of the green:red ratio of the X chromosome in relation to that of the autosomes.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jul
pubmed:issn
0196-4763
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
1
pubmed:volume
28
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
198-205
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1997
pubmed:articleTitle
Quality control of CGH: impact of metaphase chromosomes and the dynamic range of hybridization.
pubmed:affiliation
Laboratory of Cancer Genetics, University of Tampere, Finland. ritva.karhu@uta.fi
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't