Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1977-12-29
pubmed:abstractText
The criticism of interpretation of routine biochemical examinations by four clinical units (motor rehabilitation, cardiology, gastro-enterology, diabetes) was in relation to four criteria: result in agreement with the clinical observation but not providing new information, result in disagreement with the clinical observation and judged too low, result in disagreement with the clinical observation and judged too high. The comparison of judgements with regard to various analysis permits one to discuss applications of a method of objective assessment of the dialogue between the laboratory and the clinical units.
pubmed:language
fre
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0003-3898
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
35
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
97-107
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1977
pubmed:articleTitle
[Critical study of the interpretation and use of laboratory biochemical examinations in a hospital milieu].
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract