Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-7-17
pubmed:abstractText
The bond strength of six commercial soft denture liners was evaluated by a two-phase tensile test. The soft denture liners investigated were VinaSoft, Prolastic, Flexor, Molloplast-B, Novus, and SuperSoft. The samples were fabricated by processing them (1) against polymerized poly(methyl methacrylate), and (2) against unpolymerized poly(methyl methacrylate). The soft denture liners were processed according to the manufacturers recommendations. The samples were tested using an Instron Universal Testing Machine. The mode of failure, adhesive or cohesive, was also recorded. The bond strength when processed against unpolymerized poly(methyl methacrylate) ranged from 0.48 to 2.60 MPa, and when processed against polymerized poly(methyl methacrylate) the bond strength ranged from 0.94 to 2.56 MPa. A two-way analysis of variance (P = .05) revealed a significant increase in bond strength when the liners were processed against polymerized poly(methyl methacrylate), except for Novus, which had no change, and VinaSoft, which decreased. The Tukey interval between materials was .22 and between methods of polymerization was .08. Four of the six liners investigated demonstrated increased bond strength when processed against polymerized poly(methyl methacrylate). It was concluded that bonding can be influenced by the processing method.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
D
pubmed:chemical
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Acrylic Resins, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Coe Super-Soft, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Dimethylpolysiloxanes, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Flexor Dental Liner, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Lucitone, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/MDX 4-4210, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Methylmethacrylates, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Organophosphorus Compounds, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Polymers, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Polymethacrylic Acids, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Prolastic, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Silicone Elastomers, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Vinyl Compounds, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/polyphosphazene fluoroelastomer
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0893-2174
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
10
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
178-82
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-12-7
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Bond strength of six soft denture liners processed against polymerized and unpolymerized poly(methyl methacrylate).
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Removable Prosthodontics, University of Tokushima School of Dentistry, Japan.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.