Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-7-22
pubmed:abstractText
The indications for, and predictors of outcome following cricopharyngeal disruption in pharyngeal dysphagia are not clearly defined. Our purpose was to examine the symptomatic response to cricopharyngeal disruption, by either myotomy or dilatation, in patients with oral-pharyngeal dysphagia and to determine pre-treatment manometric or radiographic predictors of outcome. Using simultaneous pharyngeal videoradiography and manometry, we studied 20 patients with pharyngeal dysphagia prior to cricopharyngeal dilatation (n = 11) or myotomy (n = 8), and 23 healthy controls. We measured peak pharyngeal pressure, hypopharyngeal intrabolus pressure, upper esophageal sphincter diameter, and coordination. Response rate to sphincter disruption was 65%. The extent of sphincter opening was significantly reduced in patients compared with controls (p = 0.004), but impaired sphincter opening was not a predictor of outcome. Increased hypopharyngeal intrabolus pressures (> 19 mmHg for 10 ml bolus; > 31 mmHg for 20 ml bolus) was a significant predictor of outcome (p = 0.01). Neither peak pharyngeal pressure nor incoordination were predictors of outcome. In pharyngeal dysphagia, hypopharyngeal intrabolus pressure, and not peak pharyngeal pressure, is a predictor of response to cricopharyngeal disruption. The relationship between intrabolus pressure and impaired sphincter opening is an indirect measure of sphincter compliance which helps predict therapeutic response.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
D
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0179-051X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
12
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
133-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1997
pubmed:articleTitle
Predictors of outcome following cricopharyngeal disruption for pharyngeal dysphagia.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Gastroenterology, St. George Hospital, University of New South Wales, Australia.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't