Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:9183353rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007282lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9183353lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0041618lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9183353lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9183353lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0441800lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9183353lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0919553lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:dateCreated1997-7-1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:abstractTextCarotid ultrasound had modest accuracy in the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) of carotid endarterectomy in predicting severe carotid stenosis when a 250-cm/s peak systolic velocity (PSV) criterion was applied to different laboratories. We compared the performance of two independent laboratories using similar equipment (ATL-HDI Ultramark 9) but different interpretation criteria.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:issn0039-2499lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HamiltonPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GrottaJ CJClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VitalDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AlexandrovA...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BrodieD SDSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:volume28lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:pagination1208-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9183353-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9183353-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9183353-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9183353-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9183353-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9183353-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9183353-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:year1997lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:articleTitleGrading carotid stenosis with ultrasound. An interlaboratory comparison.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:affiliationCenter for Noninvasive Brain Perfusion Studies, University of Texas Houston Medical School 77030, USA. avalexanthrov@worldnet.alt.netlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9183353pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed