Linked Life Data

9120786

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/9120786

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-4-22
pubmed:abstractText
By using a round-robin design, groups of freshmen reported their impressions of dormmates at 4 different times during the year. Consensus on W. T. Norman's Big Five (1963) did not increase over the year, even though reported acquaintance did increase. Agreement in liking predicted agreement in the trait ratings, such that groups that agreed in their evaluations of one another were more likely to agree in their trait impressions of one another, and vice versa. These patterns, obtained by using trait ratings, were replicated with open-ended descriptions of the targets. Correlations with self-judgments did not increase with acquaintance. The data suggest that increased acquaintance does not produce increased consensus. Instead, the role of agreement in evaluations is explored as a determining factor in the level of obtained consensus.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0022-3514
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
72
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
604-16
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-11
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1997
pubmed:articleTitle
Longitudinal changes in consensus as a function of acquaintance and agreement in liking.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Boulder 80309, USA. bpark@clipr.colorado.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.