Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-4-2
pubmed:abstractText
People were shown rotated letters and timed as they decided (a) whether the letters were normal or backward, or (b) whether a dot was to the left or right of each letter with respect to its upright orientation. In the viewer-centered version of (b), the judgement was to be independent of whether the letter was normal or backward, so that stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility was confounded with angular orientation. In the letter-centered version, the judgement was relative to the letter's own coordinates, so that the confounding between S-R compatibility and orientation was reversed for backward letters. The functions relating RT to angular orientation were parallel across the three tasks, suggesting that S-R compatibility played no role, and that the participants mentally rotated the letters to the upright in each case. A marked increase in RT to backward letters in the letter-centered task suggested a second rotation in depth to restore the letters to normal.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
1196-1961
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
50
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
397-401
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
The roles of stimulus-response compatibility and mental rotation in mirror-image and left-right decisions.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, New Zealand. m.corballis@auckland.ac.nz
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article