Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
5
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1997-2-26
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
A semi-continuous thermodilution method (CCO) was recently developed to measure cardiac output with less risk of bacterial contamination, fluid overload, and user-induced errors than the classical bolus technique (BCO). Previous comparison between these two methods showed negligible bias. However, large limits of agreement suggest that the two methods are not interchangeable. We hypothesized that this poor agreement may be due to differences in reproducibility.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Sep
|
| pubmed:issn |
0748-1977
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
12
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
379-85
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:8934344-Cardiac Output,
pubmed-meshheading:8934344-Critical Illness,
pubmed-meshheading:8934344-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:8934344-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:8934344-Monitoring, Physiologic,
pubmed-meshheading:8934344-Reproducibility of Results,
pubmed-meshheading:8934344-Thermodilution
|
| pubmed:year |
1996
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Reproducibility of thermodilution cardiac output determination in critically ill patients: comparison between bolus and continuous method.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Medical Intensive Care Unit, Pontchaillou University-Hospital, Rennes, France.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|