Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
331
pubmed:dateCreated
1996-12-2
pubmed:abstractText
Proprioception was measured in 2 groups of patients after successful knee arthroplasty. Twenty-eight patients had total knee arthroplasty and their results were compared with an age matched group of 10 subjects who had undergone unicondylar knee arthroplasty. The threshold to detection of passive motion was quantified as a measure of proprioception. The degree of preoperative arthritis was objectively classified according to Resnick. The anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament were present and preserved in all the patients who had undergone unicondylar knee arthroplasty. The anterior cruciate ligament was sacrificed and posterior cruciate ligament retained in 15 of the patients who had total knee arthroplasty and the anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament were sacrificed in 13 of the patients who had total knee arthroplasties. There was no difference in threshold to detection of passive motion among any of the 3 groups. Maintaining the anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament did not impart improved proprioception in unicondylar knee arthroplasty nor did maintaining the posterior cruciate ligament impart improved proprioception in total knee arthroplasty.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
0009-921X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
179-84
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
Proprioception after unicondylar knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't