Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-1-30
pubmed:abstractText
To assess differences between Africans and expatriates, we reviewed records of 100 patients with loiasis presenting to The Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London. Fifty-one were black Africans, and 49 were white expatriates. A history of Calabar swellings was more common amongst expatriates (P = 0.0001, OR 8.1), whilst eyeworm was reported more frequently in Africans (P = 0.0038, OR 4.2). Higher eosinophil levels (P < 0.0001) and filarial antibody levels, whether measured by immunofluorescence (P = 0.047) or ELISA (P < 0.0001) were present in the expatriates. Africans were more likely to have microfilaraemia (P < 0.0025, OR 7.3), and among microfilaraemic patients, Africans had denser microfilaraemia (P = 0.012). The sensitivity of microfilaremia as a screening test for loiasis was 75% in Africans and 29% in expatriates. The sensitivities of filarial antibody tests in Africans and expatriates were 81% and 100% for IFAT, and 28% and 93% for ELISA. Following treatment, 63% of patients were considered cured, 25% were lost to follow-up and 12% had a documented relapse. The differences between the two groups of patients could be caused by differences in the chronicity of loiasis, but other explanations are also discussed.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0163-4453
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
33
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
103-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
Clinical and laboratory features of patients with loiasis (Loa loa filariasis) in the U.K.
pubmed:affiliation
Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, U.K.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article