Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1996-12-20
pubmed:abstractText
The intense and ongoing debate on physicians' right to refuse requested life-prolonging medical interventions highlights one of the emerging problems in modern medicine: the limits, if any, to a patient (or proxy's) claim to requested treatment. How is the physician to respond to requests for treatment believed by the physician to be futile, ineffective, or inappropriate? Three cases, Baby L, the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) baby, and Baby K, help focus the ethical and legal issues in this debate.
pubmed:keyword
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
E
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0095-5108
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
23
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
563-71
pubmed:dateRevised
2005-11-16
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
Physicians' refusal to provide life-prolonging medical interventions.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Theology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review