Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1996-12-4
pubmed:abstractText
A recent report by Hilsenroth and Handler (1995) surveyed graduate students' impressions of their predoctoral-level training on the Rorschach method. My commentary underscores two central points from their article: (a) the problem of program specialization in a crowded curriculum, and (b) students' indication of a need for more secure grounding in personality theory and clinical diagnosis. The focus of these remarks concerns current trends in clinical psychology education, their implications for training in psychological assessment, establishing a reasonable upper limit of solid competence for achieving a journeyman level of ability, and some considerations about a suitable role for continuing education workshops. A sharp distinction between filing in gaps in knowledge and compensating for fundamental deficiencies is emphasized in this context.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0022-3891
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
66
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
355-62
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
Teaching the Rorschach and learning psychodiagnostic testing: a commentary on Hilsenroth and Handler (1995).
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Psychology, Long Island University, Brookville, NY 11548, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article