Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1996-11-22
pubmed:abstractText
The purpose of the study was to compare the utility of an American Medical Association (AMA)-derived list and a Maryland State Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (state)-derived list of potential childhood vaccine providers (CVPs) in identifying true childhood vaccine providers for the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program in Maryland. A telephone survey of a sample of physicians from the two lists was used to determine their status as providers of routine vaccinations to children. Results showed a significant difference between the two lists. The state-derived list was composed of an estimated 60.7% CVPs, whereas the AMA-derived list was composed of an estimated 36.7% CVPs. Using the capture-recapture method, it was estimated that there are about 2077 CVPs in Maryland. Based on this figure, the state-derived list would have identified 71.7% of the state's CVPs, and the AMA-derived list would have identified 59.4%. Using the AMA-derived list would have required contacting approximately 1800 extra providers to identify the additional 350 CVPs (16.8%) not identified in the state-derived list. Accurate, up-to-date lists of providers that include pertinent practice characteristics would enhance the ability to contact specific providers for VFC program enrollment and for other clinical and public health purposes.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0886-0572
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
45
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
222-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-19
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
Identification of childhood vaccine providers in Maryland.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of epidemiology and preventive medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article