Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1996-11-15
pubmed:abstractText
In a prospective multicenter study we evaluated vision with the True Vista bifocal IOL. At 12-14 months after operation. 391 patients ("best cases") were available for follow-up. Without (with) correction, 14.4% (37.9%) had a distance acuity of 20/20 or better, 28% (69.6%) had 20/25 or better, 70% (96.9%) had 20/40 or better, and 30% (3.1%) had a distance acuity of less than 20/40. Near acuity without (with) correction was 20/20 or better in 18.7% (57.5%), 20/25 or better in 42.9% (80.8%), 20/40 or better in 84% (97.5%), and less than 20/40 in 16% (2.5%). Our results demonstrate that corrected distance and near acuity with the True Vista bifocal IOL is good. However, due to surgically induced astigmatism and inaccuracies of IOL power calculation, uncorrected acuities are still disappointing. Thus, when implanting bifocal IOLs, careful patient selection, control of astigmatism and IOL power calculation seems crucial.
pubmed:language
ger
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0941-293X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
93
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
17-21
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-11-21
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
[The True-Vista bifocal intraocular lens. Current results of the European multicenter study].
pubmed:affiliation
Universitäts-Augenklinik, Klinikum Mannheim der Universität, Heideberg.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract, Multicenter Study