Linked Life Data

8842588

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/8842588

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1996-12-19
pubmed:abstractText
The abortifacient effects of mifepristone and HRP 2000 were compared in gravid long-tailed macaques. Thirty-six animals were studied with treatment administered either by the oral (0.5 or 5.0 mg/kg; N = 5 per antiprogestin per dose) or intramuscular (i.m.) routes (0.5 mg/kg; N = 5 per antiprogestin) on gestational days (GD) 23-26; six vehicle controls were included. Blood samples were collected for assay of progesterone (P4) and each of the antiprogestins (pre-treatment, daily GD 23-28, every other day GD 30-40), and animals were monitored sonographically throughout gestation. Results of these studies indicated high rates of abortion with i.m. administration (3/5 mifepristone, 4/5 HRP 2000) and 5.0 mg/kg oral route (4/5, 2/5, respectively), with less effects noted at oral doses of 0.5 mg/kg (2/5, 0/5, respectively). No early abortions were observed in the control groups. Following daily i.m. treatment, peak levels of 8-16 ng/ml mifepristone were detected whereas 6-10 ng/ ml of HRP 2000 were noted (GD 26-27). No serum levels of mifepristone were detected following either of the oral doses whereas serum levels of 2-6 ng/ml HRP 2000 were noted with high dose oral administratation. Results of these studies suggest: (1) both antiprogestins are roughly comparable in terminating early pregnancy although HRP 2000 may be more efficacious when administered i.m. whereas mifepristone may be more effective when administered orally; (2) similar levels of biological activity are seen with the i.m. and high dose oral dosing regimens, with little or no activity with the oral low dose; and (3) infants resulting from surviving pregnancies were not affected by early gestation exposure.
pubmed:keyword
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Abortifacient Agents, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Abortion, Drug Induced, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Abortion, Induced, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Americas, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Animals, Laboratory, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Biology, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Clinical Research, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Comparative Studies, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Developed Countries, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Endocrine System, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Family Planning, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Fertility Control, Postconception, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Hormone Antagonists, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Hormones, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/North America, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Northern America, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/PROGESTERONE, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Physiology, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Progestational Hormones, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Research Methodology, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Research Report, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Ru-486, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Studies, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/United States
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
0010-7824
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
54
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
107-15
pubmed:dateRevised
2010-2-4
pubmed:otherAbstract
PIP: The primary objective was to compare the relative potencies of mifepristone and another newly synthesized antiprogestin, HRP 2000 (17-alpha-acetoxy-11-beta-[4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl]-pregna-4,9- diene-3,20-dione) in terminating early pregnancy in gravid long-tailed macaques. 36 animals were studied with treatment administered either by the oral (0.5 or 5.0 ng/kg; N = 5 per antiprogestin per dose) or intramuscular (im) routes (0.5 ng/kg; N = 5 per antiprogestin) on gestational days (GD) 23-26; 6 vehicle controls were included. Blood samples were collected for assay of progesterone (P4) and each of the antiprogestins (pre-treatment, daily GD 23-28, every other day GD 30-40), and the animals were monitored sonographically throughout gestation. Results of these studies indicated high rates of abortion with im administration (3/5 mifepristone, 4/5 HRP 2000) and the 5.0 mg/kg oral route (4/5, 2/5, respectively), with less effects noted at oral doses of 0.5 mg/kg (2/5, 0/5, respectively). No early abortions were observed in the control groups. Following daily im treatment, peak levels of 8-16 ng/ml mifepristone were detected, whereas 6-10 ng/ml of HRP 2000 were noted (GD 26-27). No serum levels of mifepristone were detected following either of the oral doses, whereas serum levels of 2-6 ng/ml HRP 2000 were noted with high-dose oral administration. Results of these studies suggest: 1) both antiprogestins are roughly comparable in terminating early pregnancy, although HRP 2000 may be more efficacious when administered im, whereas mifepristone may be more effective when administered orally; 2) similar levels of biological activity are seen with the im and high-dose oral dosing regimens, with little or no activity with the oral low dose; and 3) infants resulting from surviving pregnancies were not affected by early gestation exposure.
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
Effects of two antiprogestins on early pregnancy in the long-tailed macaque (Macaca fascicularis).
pubmed:affiliation
California Regional Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis 95616, USA. aftarantal@ucdavis.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't