Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1996-12-4
pubmed:abstractText
Twenty neonates in a special care baby unit (SCBU) were tested using automated procedures for obtaining auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE). All 40 ears passed the initial ABR screen, while the pass rate for the TEOAE screen was only 52.5%. Ears with no external or middle ear abnormalities (group A) had a significantly higher TEOAE pass rate (94.7%) than those with at least one abnormality (group B) as detected by otoscopic examination and tympanometry (14.3%). Other variables, such as age at test, gestational age at birth and birth weight, did not differ significantly between groups A and B. We conclude that external/middle ear abnormalities in this group of neonates had no effect on the ABR screening results, but had a significant effect on the TEOAE screening results.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0300-5364
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
30
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
3-8
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
Otoacoustic emission versus ABR screening: the effect of external and middle ear abnormalities in a group of SCBU neonates.
pubmed:affiliation
Centre for Audiology, Education of the Deaf and Speech Pathology, Manchester University.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study