Linked Life Data

8791189

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/8791189

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-1-17
pubmed:abstractText
Ninety-six crossbred steers (316 kg) were used in a 135-d growth-performance trial to evaluate the comparative feeding value of yellow rease (0 vs 6%) in 10% forage vs 30% forage rowing-finishing diets. There were interactions between forage level and supplemental fat on ADG (P < 10), DM conversion (P < .05), diet NE (P < .10), longissimus muscle area (P < .01), fat thickness (P < 10), and percentage of retail yield (P < .01). Supplemental fat increased (8.5%; P < .10) marbling score, sufficient to move the average carcass grade from high Select to low Choice. With the low-forage diet supplemental fat did not affect (P > .10) ADG, but decreased (P < .01) retail yield (2.3%) and longissimus muscle area (5.6%). With the high-forage diet supplemental fat increased ADG (13.3%; P < .05) and longissimus muscle area (7.1%; P < .01) but did not affect (P > .10) retail yield. Differences in carcass fat were small and not affected by treatment (P > .10). The NEm and NEg values of yellow grease were 3.55 and 2.65 Mcal/kg, respectively, for the low-forage diet and 5.71 and 4.65 Mcal/kg, respectively, for the high-forage diet. Treatment effects on characteristics of ruminal and total tract digestion were evaluated using four Holstein steers (233 kg) with cannulas in the rumen and proximal duodenum. There were no interactions (P > .10) between forage level and supplemental fat on ruminal and total tract digestibility of OM, ADF, starch, lipid, and gross energy. Postruminal lipid digestibility averaged 65.5% and was not affected (P > .10) by forage level. The ME value of yellow grease was the same (6.94 Mcal/kg) for both the low- and high-forage diets. There was an interaction between supplemental fat and forage level on nonammonia N flow to the small intestine (P < .10), percentage of ruminal escape feed N (P < .05), postruminal N digestion (P < .05), and methane production (P < .10). With the low-forage diet, fat supplementation did not affect (P > .10) ruminal degradation for feed N and methane production. With the high-forage diet fat supplementation decreased ruminal degradation of feed N (19.0%; P < .05) and methane production (14.8%; P < .05). We concluded that supplementation of a 30% forage (alfalfa hay) finishing diet with 6% yellow grease will permit growth-performance similar to that of steers fed a 10% forage diet without supplemental fat. The improved performance may be attributed to increased diet energy density and positive associative effects on protein flow to the small intestine and decreased ruminal methane production.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0021-8812
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
74
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1194-201
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
Effects of forage level on the comparative feeding value of supplemental fat in growing-finishing diets for feedlot cattle.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Animal Science, Imperial Valley Agricultural Center, University of California, El Centro 92243, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study