|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
8
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1996-10-1
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
An evaluator-blinded randomized clinical trial was undertaken to assess the effectiveness and patient acceptance of three bowel cleansing regimens: conventional cleansing enema, Pico-salax and Golytely.
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
|
pubmed:chemical |
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Aug
|
|
pubmed:issn |
0009-9260
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
|
pubmed:volume |
51
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
566-9
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-11-18
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:8761394-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:8761394-Barium Sulfate,
pubmed-meshheading:8761394-Cathartics,
pubmed-meshheading:8761394-Defecation,
pubmed-meshheading:8761394-Electrolytes,
pubmed-meshheading:8761394-Enema,
pubmed-meshheading:8761394-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:8761394-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:8761394-Picolines,
pubmed-meshheading:8761394-Polyethylene Glycols,
pubmed-meshheading:8761394-Prospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:8761394-Therapeutic Irrigation
|
|
pubmed:year |
1996
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
A blinded clinical trial comparing conventional cleansing enema, Pico-salax and Golytely for barium enema bowel preparation.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Diagnostic Radiology Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Randomized Controlled Trial
|
