Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
3
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1996-10-8
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Conservative renal cell cancer surgery in elective conditions can be applied if the tumor is solitary and well delineated on the CT scan and easily resectable within a rim of healthy parenchyma. A number of solid tumors will prove not to be malignant on definite pathological examination. The radiological preoperative differential diagnosis of a small renal mass is not always obvious. The efficacy of fine-needle aspiration cytology in recognizing the pathology of the tumor before surgery is limited and major complications have been reported. Moreover, it can render a conservative surgical procedure less safe. Thus fineneedle aspiration cytology is not recommended if conservative surgery is planned, unless renal involvement by metastasis or lymphoma is suspected.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:issn |
0302-2838
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
29
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
284-7
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1996
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
The case against fine-needle aspiration cytology for small solid kidney tumors.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Urology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Case Reports
|