rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1996-8-19
|
pubmed:abstractText |
One hundred and fifty ASA 1 and 2 patients were randomly allocated to receive pethidine 25 mg (1 ml), lignocaine 10 mg (1 ml) or 0.9% saline (1 ml) on a double-blind basis, as pretreatment to reduce pain on injection of propofol. Both active treatments were significantly better than placebo at preventing pain (p < 0.01). Lignocaine was most effective in preventing pain in men (p < 0.05) whilst pethidine was more effective in women (p < 0.05).
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
pubmed:chemical |
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Apr
|
pubmed:issn |
0003-2409
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
51
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
394-5
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:8686833-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:8686833-Analgesics, Opioid,
pubmed-meshheading:8686833-Anesthetics, Intravenous,
pubmed-meshheading:8686833-Anesthetics, Local,
pubmed-meshheading:8686833-Double-Blind Method,
pubmed-meshheading:8686833-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:8686833-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:8686833-Injections, Intravenous,
pubmed-meshheading:8686833-Lidocaine,
pubmed-meshheading:8686833-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:8686833-Meperidine,
pubmed-meshheading:8686833-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:8686833-Pain,
pubmed-meshheading:8686833-Propofol,
pubmed-meshheading:8686833-Sex Factors
|
pubmed:year |
1996
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Modification of pain on injection of propofol. A comparison of pethidine and lignocaine.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Anaesthesia, Cappagh Orthopaedic Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Comparative Study,
Randomized Controlled Trial
|